Understanding covid-19 outcomes among people with intellectual disabilities in England

Filip Sosenko (Lead / Corresponding author), Daniel Mackay, Jill P. Pell, Chris Hatton, Bhautesh D. Jani, Deborah Cairns, Laura Ward, Angela Henderson, Michael Fleming, Dewy Nijhof, Craig Melville, CVD-COVID-UK/COVID-IMPACT Consortium

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

3 Citations (Scopus)
55 Downloads (Pure)

Abstract

Background: Evidence from the UK from the early stages of the covid-19 pandemic showed that people with Intellectual Disabilities (ID) had higher rates of covid-19 mortality than people without ID. However, estimates of the magnitude of risk vary widely; different studies used different time periods; and only early stages of the pandemic have been analysed. Existing analyses of risk factors have also been limited. The objective of this study was to investigate covid-19 mortality rates, hospitalisation rates, and risk factors in people with ID in England up to the end of 2021.

Methods: Retrospective cohort study of all people with a laboratory-confirmed SARS-CoV-2 infection or death involving covid-19. Datasets covering primary care, secondary care, covid-19 tests and vaccinations, prescriptions, and deaths were linked at individual level.

Results: Covid-19 carries a disproportionately higher risk of death for people with ID, above their already higher risk of dying from other causes, in comparison to those without ID. Around 2,000 people with ID had a death involving covid-19 in England up to the end of 2021; approximately 1 in 180. The covid-19 standardized mortality ratio was 5.6 [95% CI 5.4, 5.9]. People with ID were also more likely to be hospitalised for covid-19 than people without ID. The main determinants of severe covid-19 outcomes (deaths and/or hospitalisations) in both populations were age, multimorbidity and vaccination status. The key factor responsible for the higher risk of severe covid-19 in the ID population was a much higher prevalence of multimorbidity in this population. AstraZeneca vaccine was slightly less effective in preventing severe covid-19 outcomes among people with ID than among people without ID.

Conclusions: People with ID should be considered a priority group in future pandemics, such as shielding and vaccinations.

Original languageEnglish
Article number2099
Number of pages13
JournalBMC Public Health
Volume23
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 25 Oct 2023

Keywords

  • Humans
  • COVID-19/epidemiology
  • Pandemics
  • Intellectual Disability/epidemiology
  • Retrospective Studies
  • SARS-CoV-2
  • England/epidemiology
  • Intellectual Disabilities
  • Covid-19
  • Learning disabilities

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Understanding covid-19 outcomes among people with intellectual disabilities in England'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this