University of Dundee, School of Life Sciences: Our Evaluation Story

Erin Hardee; Amy Cameron; Ali Floyd; Diane Kennedy

doi:10.20933/100001155

University of Dundee, School of Life Sciences: Our Evaluation Story

Erin Hardee
, Amy Cameron
, Ali Floyd
, Diane Kennedy

Biological Chemistry and Drug Discovery

Research output: Other contribution

469 Downloads (Pure)

Abstract

We started looking seriously at our evaluation strategy at the end of 2017 and quickly realised we didn’t really have one. That didn’t mean we weren’t doing evaluation, but it was very ‘apples and oranges’ – evaluating the individual aims of the projects and whether they were ‘good’. We wanted to be able to look at our evaluation as a whole but didn’t know where to start.

Original language	English
Type	Evaluation Strategy Document
Publisher	University of Dundee
Number of pages	8
Place of Publication	Dundee
DOIs	https://doi.org/10.20933/100001155
Publication status	Published - Feb 2020

UN SDGs

This output contributes to the following UN Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs)

SDG 4 Quality Education

Access to Document

10.20933/100001155

Our Evaluation StoryFinal published version, 118 KB

Telling the story together: understanding the difference engagement makes
Cameron, A. (Speaker), Sarcol, E. (Speaker), Hutchinson-Pascal, N. (Speaker), Bashir, A. (Speaker) & Raymond-Williams, R. (Contributor)
30 Apr 2026
Activity: Talk or presentation types › Oral presentation

Cite this

@misc{94cd26996d614947bdfc937229efd26a,

title = "University of Dundee, School of Life Sciences: Our Evaluation Story",

abstract = "We started looking seriously at our evaluation strategy at the end of 2017 and quickly realised we didn{\textquoteright}t really have one. That didn{\textquoteright}t mean we weren{\textquoteright}t doing evaluation, but it was very {\textquoteleft}apples and oranges{\textquoteright} {\textendash} evaluating the individual aims of the projects and whether they were {\textquoteleft}good{\textquoteright}. We wanted to be able to look at our evaluation as a whole but didn{\textquoteright}t know where to start.",

author = "Erin Hardee and Amy Cameron and Ali Floyd and Diane Kennedy",

year = "2020",

month = feb,

doi = "10.20933/100001155",

language = "English",

publisher = "University of Dundee",

type = "Other",

}

TY - GEN

T1 - University of Dundee, School of Life Sciences

T2 - Our Evaluation Story

AU - Hardee, Erin

AU - Cameron, Amy

AU - Floyd, Ali

AU - Kennedy, Diane

PY - 2020/2

Y1 - 2020/2

N2 - We started looking seriously at our evaluation strategy at the end of 2017 and quickly realised we didn’t really have one. That didn’t mean we weren’t doing evaluation, but it was very ‘apples and oranges’ – evaluating the individual aims of the projects and whether they were ‘good’. We wanted to be able to look at our evaluation as a whole but didn’t know where to start.

AB - We started looking seriously at our evaluation strategy at the end of 2017 and quickly realised we didn’t really have one. That didn’t mean we weren’t doing evaluation, but it was very ‘apples and oranges’ – evaluating the individual aims of the projects and whether they were ‘good’. We wanted to be able to look at our evaluation as a whole but didn’t know where to start.

U2 - 10.20933/100001155

DO - 10.20933/100001155

M3 - Other contribution

PB - University of Dundee

CY - Dundee

ER -

University of Dundee, School of Life Sciences: Our Evaluation Story

Abstract

UN SDGs

Access to Document

Fingerprint

Activities

Telling the story together: understanding the difference engagement makes​

Cite this

Telling the story together: understanding the difference engagement makes