University Selectivity and the Relative Returns to Higher Education: Evidence from the UK

Ian Walker, Yu Zhu

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

    3 Citations (Scopus)
    59 Downloads (Pure)

    Abstract

    We study the wage outcomes of university graduates by course (i.e. by subject and institution) using the UK Labour Force Surveys (LFS). We that the selectivity of undergraduate degree programmes plays an important role in explaining the variation in the relative graduate wages. In fact, we find that much of the variation in relative wages across courses is due to the quality of students selected. Once we allow for course selectivity in our analysis we find that our estimates of the effects of attending the most prestigious HEIs is around 10 percentage points lower than otherwise; the effects of attending the middle ranking HEIs is around 5 percentage points lower; and that of attending these lowest ranking HEIs is unaffected. We go on to consider selection (on observables) into subjects and institutions using the Inverse Probability Weighted Regression Adjusted (IPWRA) method to estimate multiple treatment effects.
    Original languageEnglish
    Pages (from-to)230-249
    Number of pages20
    JournalLabour Economics
    Volume53
    Early online date16 May 2018
    DOIs
    Publication statusPublished - Aug 2018

    Fingerprint

    Ranking
    Selectivity
    Wages
    Treatment effects
    Labor force
    Undergraduate
    Relative wages

    Keywords

    • College selectivity
    • Relative returns to higher education

    Cite this

    @article{495ce560dc254285bc6acc110f510821,
    title = "University Selectivity and the Relative Returns to Higher Education: Evidence from the UK",
    abstract = "We study the wage outcomes of university graduates by course (i.e. by subject and institution) using the UK Labour Force Surveys (LFS). We that the selectivity of undergraduate degree programmes plays an important role in explaining the variation in the relative graduate wages. In fact, we find that much of the variation in relative wages across courses is due to the quality of students selected. Once we allow for course selectivity in our analysis we find that our estimates of the effects of attending the most prestigious HEIs is around 10 percentage points lower than otherwise; the effects of attending the middle ranking HEIs is around 5 percentage points lower; and that of attending these lowest ranking HEIs is unaffected. We go on to consider selection (on observables) into subjects and institutions using the Inverse Probability Weighted Regression Adjusted (IPWRA) method to estimate multiple treatment effects.",
    keywords = "College selectivity, Relative returns to higher education",
    author = "Ian Walker and Yu Zhu",
    note = "no funding",
    year = "2018",
    month = "8",
    doi = "10.1016/j.labeco.2018.05.005",
    language = "English",
    volume = "53",
    pages = "230--249",
    journal = "Labour Economics",
    issn = "0927-5371",
    publisher = "Elsevier",

    }

    University Selectivity and the Relative Returns to Higher Education : Evidence from the UK. / Walker, Ian ; Zhu, Yu.

    In: Labour Economics, Vol. 53, 08.2018, p. 230-249.

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

    TY - JOUR

    T1 - University Selectivity and the Relative Returns to Higher Education

    T2 - Evidence from the UK

    AU - Walker, Ian

    AU - Zhu, Yu

    N1 - no funding

    PY - 2018/8

    Y1 - 2018/8

    N2 - We study the wage outcomes of university graduates by course (i.e. by subject and institution) using the UK Labour Force Surveys (LFS). We that the selectivity of undergraduate degree programmes plays an important role in explaining the variation in the relative graduate wages. In fact, we find that much of the variation in relative wages across courses is due to the quality of students selected. Once we allow for course selectivity in our analysis we find that our estimates of the effects of attending the most prestigious HEIs is around 10 percentage points lower than otherwise; the effects of attending the middle ranking HEIs is around 5 percentage points lower; and that of attending these lowest ranking HEIs is unaffected. We go on to consider selection (on observables) into subjects and institutions using the Inverse Probability Weighted Regression Adjusted (IPWRA) method to estimate multiple treatment effects.

    AB - We study the wage outcomes of university graduates by course (i.e. by subject and institution) using the UK Labour Force Surveys (LFS). We that the selectivity of undergraduate degree programmes plays an important role in explaining the variation in the relative graduate wages. In fact, we find that much of the variation in relative wages across courses is due to the quality of students selected. Once we allow for course selectivity in our analysis we find that our estimates of the effects of attending the most prestigious HEIs is around 10 percentage points lower than otherwise; the effects of attending the middle ranking HEIs is around 5 percentage points lower; and that of attending these lowest ranking HEIs is unaffected. We go on to consider selection (on observables) into subjects and institutions using the Inverse Probability Weighted Regression Adjusted (IPWRA) method to estimate multiple treatment effects.

    KW - College selectivity

    KW - Relative returns to higher education

    UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85047447609&partnerID=8YFLogxK

    U2 - 10.1016/j.labeco.2018.05.005

    DO - 10.1016/j.labeco.2018.05.005

    M3 - Article

    VL - 53

    SP - 230

    EP - 249

    JO - Labour Economics

    JF - Labour Economics

    SN - 0927-5371

    ER -