Unpublished policy trials, the risk of false discoveries and the persistence of authority-based policy

Jonathan Mendel (Lead / Corresponding author)

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

114 Downloads (Pure)

Abstract

The use of trials in the policy process is often presented as a move towards evidence-based policy and away from authority-, ideology- or faith-based policy. However, this paper will draw on two UK examples of unpublished policy trials in order to argue that – when policy is based on such research – it should not usually be described as evidence-based. Instead, the paper will argue that policies based on such unpublished trials are, at best, authority-based.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)323-334
Number of pages12
JournalEvidence & Policy
Volume14
Issue number2
Early online date31 Oct 2016
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 31 May 2018

Fingerprint

persistence
faith
evidence
ideology

Keywords

  • Evidence-based policy
  • Evidence-informed policy
  • RCTs
  • Trials

Cite this

@article{e26ca9c87a2242afab6d65bb4e206a5d,
title = "Unpublished policy trials, the risk of false discoveries and the persistence of authority-based policy",
abstract = "The use of trials in the policy process is often presented as a move towards evidence-based policy and away from authority-, ideology- or faith-based policy. However, this paper will draw on two UK examples of unpublished policy trials in order to argue that – when policy is based on such research – it should not usually be described as evidence-based. Instead, the paper will argue that policies based on such unpublished trials are, at best, authority-based.",
keywords = "Evidence-based policy, Evidence-informed policy, RCTs, Trials",
author = "Jonathan Mendel",
year = "2018",
month = "5",
day = "31",
doi = "10.1332/174426416X14779397727921",
language = "English",
volume = "14",
pages = "323--334",
journal = "Evidence & Policy",
issn = "1744-2648",
publisher = "Policy Press",
number = "2",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Unpublished policy trials, the risk of false discoveries and the persistence of authority-based policy

AU - Mendel, Jonathan

PY - 2018/5/31

Y1 - 2018/5/31

N2 - The use of trials in the policy process is often presented as a move towards evidence-based policy and away from authority-, ideology- or faith-based policy. However, this paper will draw on two UK examples of unpublished policy trials in order to argue that – when policy is based on such research – it should not usually be described as evidence-based. Instead, the paper will argue that policies based on such unpublished trials are, at best, authority-based.

AB - The use of trials in the policy process is often presented as a move towards evidence-based policy and away from authority-, ideology- or faith-based policy. However, this paper will draw on two UK examples of unpublished policy trials in order to argue that – when policy is based on such research – it should not usually be described as evidence-based. Instead, the paper will argue that policies based on such unpublished trials are, at best, authority-based.

KW - Evidence-based policy

KW - Evidence-informed policy

KW - RCTs

KW - Trials

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85049029062&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1332/174426416X14779397727921

DO - 10.1332/174426416X14779397727921

M3 - Article

VL - 14

SP - 323

EP - 334

JO - Evidence & Policy

JF - Evidence & Policy

SN - 1744-2648

IS - 2

ER -