Unpublished policy trials, the risk of false discoveries and the persistence of authority-based policy

Jonathan Mendel

doi:10.1332/174426416X14779397727921

Unpublished policy trials, the risk of false discoveries and the persistence of authority-based policy

Jonathan Mendel (Lead / Corresponding author)

Research output: Contribution to journal › Article › peer-review

4 Citations (Scopus)

285 Downloads (Pure)

Abstract

The use of trials in the policy process is often presented as a move towards evidence-based policy and away from authority-, ideology- or faith-based policy. However, this paper will draw on two UK examples of unpublished policy trials in order to argue that – when policy is based on such research – it should not usually be described as evidence-based. Instead, the paper will argue that policies based on such unpublished trials are, at best, authority-based.

Original language	English
Pages (from-to)	323-334
Number of pages	12
Journal	Evidence and Policy
Volume	14
Issue number	2
Early online date	31 Oct 2016
DOIs	https://doi.org/10.1332/174426416X14779397727921
Publication status	Published - 31 May 2018

Keywords

Evidence-based policy
Evidence-informed policy
RCTs
Trials

ASJC Scopus subject areas

Social Sciences (miscellaneous)

Access to Document

10.1332/174426416X14779397727921

Author Accepted Manuscript
"This is a post-peer-review, pre-copy edited version of an article published in [insert name of relevant Policy Press journal here]. The definitive publisher-authenticated version [insert complete citation information here] is available online at: https://doi.org/10.1332/174426416X14779397727921" - See more at: http://policypress.co.uk/self-archiving#sthash.uZPW5d47.dpuf
Accepted author manuscript, 370 KB

Cite this

@article{e26ca9c87a2242afab6d65bb4e206a5d,

title = "Unpublished policy trials, the risk of false discoveries and the persistence of authority-based policy",

abstract = "The use of trials in the policy process is often presented as a move towards evidence-based policy and away from authority-, ideology- or faith-based policy. However, this paper will draw on two UK examples of unpublished policy trials in order to argue that – when policy is based on such research – it should not usually be described as evidence-based. Instead, the paper will argue that policies based on such unpublished trials are, at best, authority-based.",

keywords = "Evidence-based policy, Evidence-informed policy, RCTs, Trials",

author = "Jonathan Mendel",

year = "2018",

month = may,

day = "31",

doi = "10.1332/174426416X14779397727921",

language = "English",

volume = "14",

pages = "323--334",

journal = "Evidence and Policy",

issn = "1744-2648",

publisher = "Policy Press",

number = "2",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Unpublished policy trials, the risk of false discoveries and the persistence of authority-based policy

AU - Mendel, Jonathan

PY - 2018/5/31

Y1 - 2018/5/31

N2 - The use of trials in the policy process is often presented as a move towards evidence-based policy and away from authority-, ideology- or faith-based policy. However, this paper will draw on two UK examples of unpublished policy trials in order to argue that – when policy is based on such research – it should not usually be described as evidence-based. Instead, the paper will argue that policies based on such unpublished trials are, at best, authority-based.

AB - The use of trials in the policy process is often presented as a move towards evidence-based policy and away from authority-, ideology- or faith-based policy. However, this paper will draw on two UK examples of unpublished policy trials in order to argue that – when policy is based on such research – it should not usually be described as evidence-based. Instead, the paper will argue that policies based on such unpublished trials are, at best, authority-based.

KW - Evidence-based policy

KW - Evidence-informed policy

KW - RCTs

KW - Trials

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85049029062&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1332/174426416X14779397727921

DO - 10.1332/174426416X14779397727921

M3 - Article

SN - 1744-2648

VL - 14

SP - 323

EP - 334

JO - Evidence and Policy

JF - Evidence and Policy

IS - 2

ER -

Unpublished policy trials, the risk of false discoveries and the persistence of authority-based policy

Abstract

Keywords

ASJC Scopus subject areas

Access to Document

Other files and links

Fingerprint

Cite this