Abstract
Purpose: This paper reports on a workshop discussing the views of the augmentative and alternative communication (AAC) community on the opportunities and risks posed by the integration of artificial intelligence (AI) into voice output communication aid systems. The views of the community on whether a Code of Practice was needed for the use of this new technology were also sought.
Design/methodology/approach: This was an explorative, qualitative study in which members of the AAC community attending a session at a UK national conference were invited to discuss the topic, responding to structured questions from the research team. The use of AI for both novel language generation and rate enhancement was discussed within the session.
Findings: Many potential opportunities and benefits of AI to AAC users were discussed by the group. Risks associated with new and existing biases in AI language models were raised, as was the need to ensure that outputs generated by AI were authentically authored by users. Whilst there was broad support for the idea of a Code of Practice, questions were posed about how it would be designed and what it should contain.
Originality/value: This study presents a unique insight into the views of the AAC community on the benefits and risks of incorporating AI into AAC systems. The views of the community on the need for a Code of Practice may support how the field moves forward with this complex technology.
| Original language | English |
|---|---|
| Pages (from-to) | 232-247 |
| Number of pages | 16 |
| Journal | Journal of Enabling Technologies |
| Volume | 18 |
| Issue number | 4 |
| Early online date | 13 Aug 2024 |
| DOIs | |
| Publication status | Published - 8 Nov 2024 |
Keywords
- Artificial intelligence (AI)
- Augmentative and alternative communication (AAC)
- Qualitative research
ASJC Scopus subject areas
- Health(social science)
- Rehabilitation
- Computer Science Applications
- Management of Technology and Innovation
Fingerprint
Dive into the research topics of 'Use of artificial intelligence (AI) in augmentative and alternative communication (AAC): community consultation on risks, benefits and the need for a code of practice'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.Research output
- 7 Citations
- 1 Article
-
AI, Communication Aids and the Challenge of Authentic Authorship - Whose Line Is It Anyway‽
Griffiths, T. (Lead / Corresponding author), Broomfield, K., Hrastelj, L., Judge, S. & Toogood, J., 13 Jun 2025, In: Journal of Enabling Technologies. 19, 2, p. 102-112 11 p.Research output: Contribution to journal › Article › peer-review
Open AccessFile2 Link opens in a new tab Citations (Scopus)137 Downloads (Pure)
Activities
-
Communication Matters Research Study Day 2025
Waller, A. (Invited speaker), Hemsley, B. (Invited speaker), Griffiths, T. (Invited speaker), Slaughter, R. (Invited speaker) & Broomfield, K. (Invited speaker)
10 Sept 2025Activity: Participating in or organising an event types › Participation in workshop, seminar, course
-
Project Spinnaker Advisory Group
Griffiths, T. (Member) & Waller, A. (Member)
3 Apr 2024 → …Activity: Other activity types › Public engagement and outreach - work on advisory panels
-
AI in AAC systems: current work and future research priorities
Slaughter, R. (Speaker), Griffiths, T. (Speaker) & Waller, A. (Speaker)
10 Sept 2024Activity: Talk or presentation types › Oral presentation
Cite this
- APA
- Author
- BIBTEX
- Harvard
- Standard
- RIS
- Vancouver