Methods Ten European renal registries participating in the ERA-EDTA Registry provided data on incidence (n = 13 044) and/or prevalence (n = 75 715) of vascular access types. We used logistic regression to assess which factors influence the likelihood to be treated with an AVF rather than another type.
Results The use of AVFs at the start of HD showed a significant decreasing trend from 42% in 2005 to 32% in 2009 (P < 0.0001), while the use of central venous catheters (CVCs) increased from 58 to 68% (P < 0.0001). A similar evolution pattern was observed for the prevalence; use of AVFs decreased from 66 to 62% and use of CVCs increased from 28 to 32%. There was a large international variation in the use of the different vascular access types. Female patients [adjusted odds ratio: 0.84, 95% confidence interval (CI): 0.78–0.90] and those =80 years (0.77, 95% CI: 0.67–0.90) were least likely to start HD with an AVF.
Conclusion In Europe, there is a decreasing trend in the use of AVFs and an increasing trend in the use of CVCs at the start and after the start of HD. We cannot explain all between-country variations we found, and more research is needed to clarify how healthcare around vascular access is organized in Europe.