Using Cochrane reviews for oral diseases

H. V. Worthington, A-M Glenny, L. Fernandez Mauleffinch, F. Daly, J. Clarkson

    Research output: Contribution to journalReview articlepeer-review

    3 Citations (Scopus)

    Abstract

    Objectives:

    To provide readers with information about the Cochrane Oral Health Group and how the reviews on oral diseases have contributed to guideline developments and the commissioning of trials.

    Materials and methods:

    Examples have been selected from the reviews published on The Cochrane Library. Descriptions are given of how these reviews have been used in guideline development and commissioning of trials. Readers are updated on reviews focused on the management of oral cancer and the new venture of diagnostic test reviews.

    Results:

    Reviews on the management of oral diseases due to cancer treatments have been included in guidelines and changed practice in the UK. Cochrane reviews on Bell's Palsy have led to a randomised controlled trial which has changed the evidence base. The Cochrane review on recall intervals between routine appointments has input into the NICE guideline and resulted in a randomised controlled trial to look at different intervals including a risk-based interval.

    Conclusion:

    We hope this article will give readers information on the work of the Cochrane Oral Health Group and insight into the diversity of reviews in oral diseases. The reviews are successfully being used to change practice and as background for the funding of large-scale clinical trials.

    Original languageEnglish
    Pages (from-to)592-596
    Number of pages5
    JournalOral Diseases
    Volume16
    Issue number7
    DOIs
    Publication statusPublished - Oct 2010

    Keywords

    • Cochrane Oral Health Group
    • systematic reviews
    • evidence based practice
    • oral health
    • BELLS-PALSY

    Fingerprint

    Dive into the research topics of 'Using Cochrane reviews for oral diseases'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

    Cite this