Validity and reliability of the Dundee difficult times of the day scale in Chinese children and adolescents with attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder

Yasong Du, Yi Zheng, Xiaoyan Ke, Linyan Su, David Coghill, Yun Chen, Yanlei Zhang, Zheng Yuan, Yan Cheng, Wendong Chen

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

    2 Citations (Scopus)
    312 Downloads (Pure)

    Abstract

    METHODS: A cross-sectional study enrolled 200 children and adolescents with attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder visiting four Chinese tertiary care psychiatric clinics to assess the validity and reliability of the Dundee difficult times of the day scale (D-DTODS), using the Weiss functional impairment rating scale for parents form (WFIRS-P) and the Swanson, Nolan and Pelham, version IV 26-item teacher and parent rating scale (SNAP-IV-26).

    RESULTS: The calculated Cronbach's-α for the D-DTODS total score was 0.793. The calculated Spearman's correlation coefficients for D-DTODS versus WFRIS-P and Swanson, Nolan and Pelham, version IV 26-item teacher and parent rating scale (SNAP-IV-26) were 0.425 (p < 0.01) and 0.452 (p < 0.001), respectively.

    CONCLUSION: The D-DTODS was worth future test-retest confirmation regarding reliability and validity for assessing functional impairment associated with attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder across different time periods of the day in Chinese children and adolescents.

    Original languageEnglish
    Pages (from-to)33-44
    Number of pages12
    JournalJournal of Comparative Effectiveness Research
    Volume8
    Issue number1
    DOIs
    Publication statusPublished - Jan 2019

    Keywords

    • Chinese
    • D-DTODS
    • attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder
    • reliability
    • validity

    ASJC Scopus subject areas

    • Health Policy

    Fingerprint

    Dive into the research topics of 'Validity and reliability of the Dundee difficult times of the day scale in Chinese children and adolescents with attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

    Cite this