TY - JOUR
T1 - Weak evidence supports the use of psychosocial interventions for chronic orofacial pain
AU - Themessl-Huber, Markus
N1 - Copyright 2012 Elsevier B.V., All rights reserved.
PY - 2012
Y1 - 2012
N2 - Data sources: Cochrane Oral Health Group's Trials Register, Central, Medline, Embase, PsycINFO. Study selection: Randomised controlled trials of psychosocial interventions for chronic orofacial pain were included. Psychosocial interventions targeted towards changing thoughts, behaviours and/or feelings that may exacerbate pain symptoms through a vicious cycle were eligible. Primary outcomes were pain intensity/severity, satisfaction with pain relief and quality of life. Data extraction and synthesis: Two reviewers independently screened studies, extracted data and assessed risk of bias. Dichotomous outcomes, were expressed as risk ratios with 95% confidence intervals, continuous outcomes as mean differences with 95% confidence intervals. Heterogeneity was assessed using the Cochrane test for heterogeneity and the I2 test. Meta-analyses were conducted using the random-effect or the fixed-effect models. Results: Fifteen of the 17 eligible studies were on temporomandibular disorders (TMDs), two on burning mouth syndrome. Psychosocial interventions improved long-term pain intensity (standardised mean difference (SMD) -0.34, 95% confidence interval (CI) -0.50 to -0.18) and depression (SMD -0.35, 95% CI -0.54 to -0.16). However, the risk of bias in these studies was high. Conclusions: There is weak evidence to support the use of psychosocial interventions for chronic orofacial pain.
AB - Data sources: Cochrane Oral Health Group's Trials Register, Central, Medline, Embase, PsycINFO. Study selection: Randomised controlled trials of psychosocial interventions for chronic orofacial pain were included. Psychosocial interventions targeted towards changing thoughts, behaviours and/or feelings that may exacerbate pain symptoms through a vicious cycle were eligible. Primary outcomes were pain intensity/severity, satisfaction with pain relief and quality of life. Data extraction and synthesis: Two reviewers independently screened studies, extracted data and assessed risk of bias. Dichotomous outcomes, were expressed as risk ratios with 95% confidence intervals, continuous outcomes as mean differences with 95% confidence intervals. Heterogeneity was assessed using the Cochrane test for heterogeneity and the I2 test. Meta-analyses were conducted using the random-effect or the fixed-effect models. Results: Fifteen of the 17 eligible studies were on temporomandibular disorders (TMDs), two on burning mouth syndrome. Psychosocial interventions improved long-term pain intensity (standardised mean difference (SMD) -0.34, 95% confidence interval (CI) -0.50 to -0.18) and depression (SMD -0.35, 95% CI -0.54 to -0.16). However, the risk of bias in these studies was high. Conclusions: There is weak evidence to support the use of psychosocial interventions for chronic orofacial pain.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84862871395&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1038/sj.ebd.6400865
DO - 10.1038/sj.ebd.6400865
M3 - Article
C2 - 22722420
AN - SCOPUS:84862871395
SN - 1462-0049
VL - 13
SP - 58
JO - Evidence-Based Dentistry
JF - Evidence-Based Dentistry
IS - 2
ER -