Weak evidence supports the use of psychosocial interventions for chronic orofacial pain

Markus Themessl-Huber

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

    1 Citation (Scopus)

    Abstract

    Data sources: Cochrane Oral Health Group's Trials Register, Central, Medline, Embase, PsycINFO. Study selection: Randomised controlled trials of psychosocial interventions for chronic orofacial pain were included. Psychosocial interventions targeted towards changing thoughts, behaviours and/or feelings that may exacerbate pain symptoms through a vicious cycle were eligible. Primary outcomes were pain intensity/severity, satisfaction with pain relief and quality of life. Data extraction and synthesis: Two reviewers independently screened studies, extracted data and assessed risk of bias. Dichotomous outcomes, were expressed as risk ratios with 95% confidence intervals, continuous outcomes as mean differences with 95% confidence intervals. Heterogeneity was assessed using the Cochrane test for heterogeneity and the I2 test. Meta-analyses were conducted using the random-effect or the fixed-effect models. Results: Fifteen of the 17 eligible studies were on temporomandibular disorders (TMDs), two on burning mouth syndrome. Psychosocial interventions improved long-term pain intensity (standardised mean difference (SMD) -0.34, 95% confidence interval (CI) -0.50 to -0.18) and depression (SMD -0.35, 95% CI -0.54 to -0.16). However, the risk of bias in these studies was high. Conclusions: There is weak evidence to support the use of psychosocial interventions for chronic orofacial pain.
    Original languageEnglish
    Pages (from-to)58
    Number of pages1
    JournalEvidence-Based Dentistry
    Volume13
    Issue number2
    DOIs
    Publication statusPublished - 2012

    Fingerprint Dive into the research topics of 'Weak evidence supports the use of psychosocial interventions for chronic orofacial pain'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

    Cite this