What is the Risk of Having Offspring with Cleft Lip/Palate in Pre-Maternal Obese/Overweight Women When Compared to Pre-Maternal Normal Weight Women?: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

Omoroghogho Maria Izedonmwen; Claudia Cunningham; Tatiana V Macfarlane

doi:10.5037/jomr.2015.6101

What is the Risk of Having Offspring with Cleft Lip/Palate in Pre-Maternal Obese/Overweight Women When Compared to Pre-Maternal Normal Weight Women? A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

Omoroghogho Maria Izedonmwen, Claudia Cunningham, Tatiana V Macfarlane

Molecular and Clinical Medicine

Research output: Contribution to journal › Article › peer-review

213 Downloads (Pure)

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: The purpose of the study was to identify the risk of orofacial cleft in the offspring of women with pre-maternal obesity/overweight when compared with pre-maternal normal weight women.

MATERIAL AND METHODS: MEDLINE and EMBASE were searched from 1980 to July 2014 for cohort, case control and cross sectional studies. BMI were categorized according to WHO recommendation: normal weight (BMI 18.5 - 24.9), overweight (BMI 25 - 29.9) and obese (BMI ≥ 30).

RESULTS: Six studies were identified; three case control studies which were used for the meta-analysis and two cross sectional studies and one cohort study. Compared with women of recommended BMI, obese women were at increased odds of pregnancy affected by CLP (OR = 1.16; 95% CI 1, 1.34) and CP (OR = 1.14; 95% CI 0.95, 1.37). Overweight women were also at increased odds of pregnancy affected by CLP (OR = 1.06; 95% CI 0.93, 1.21) but not CP (OR = 0.89; 95% CI 0.75, 1.06). The results of the risk ratios reported in the cross sectional and cohort studies were similar to the results of the meta-analysis.

CONCLUSIONS: The results of this study reveal that there is an increased risk of having offspring with orofacial cleft in obese/overweight women. The reason for this association is not known. Although, the risk is small, it is important because of the increasing incidence of obesity.

Original language	English
Pages (from-to)	e1
Journal	Journal of Oral and Maxillofacial Research
Volume	6
Issue number	1
DOIs	https://doi.org/10.5037/jomr.2015.6101
Publication status	Published - 6 May 2015

Keywords

Journal Article
Review

UN SDGs

This output contributes to the following UN Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs)

Access to Document

10.5037/jomr.2015.6101Licence: CC BY-NC-ND

final published versionFinal published version, 0.98 MBLicence: CC BY-NC-ND

Cite this

@article{d7d5a5171fee4865b4555d6339835c1d,

title = "What is the Risk of Having Offspring with Cleft Lip/Palate in Pre-Maternal Obese/Overweight Women When Compared to Pre-Maternal Normal Weight Women?: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis",

abstract = "OBJECTIVES: The purpose of the study was to identify the risk of orofacial cleft in the offspring of women with pre-maternal obesity/overweight when compared with pre-maternal normal weight women.MATERIAL AND METHODS: MEDLINE and EMBASE were searched from 1980 to July 2014 for cohort, case control and cross sectional studies. BMI were categorized according to WHO recommendation: normal weight (BMI 18.5 - 24.9), overweight (BMI 25 - 29.9) and obese (BMI ≥ 30).RESULTS: Six studies were identified; three case control studies which were used for the meta-analysis and two cross sectional studies and one cohort study. Compared with women of recommended BMI, obese women were at increased odds of pregnancy affected by CLP (OR = 1.16; 95% CI 1, 1.34) and CP (OR = 1.14; 95% CI 0.95, 1.37). Overweight women were also at increased odds of pregnancy affected by CLP (OR = 1.06; 95% CI 0.93, 1.21) but not CP (OR = 0.89; 95% CI 0.75, 1.06). The results of the risk ratios reported in the cross sectional and cohort studies were similar to the results of the meta-analysis.CONCLUSIONS: The results of this study reveal that there is an increased risk of having offspring with orofacial cleft in obese/overweight women. The reason for this association is not known. Although, the risk is small, it is important because of the increasing incidence of obesity.",

keywords = "Journal Article, Review",

author = "Izedonmwen, {Omoroghogho Maria} and Claudia Cunningham and Macfarlane, {Tatiana V}",

year = "2015",

month = may,

day = "6",

doi = "10.5037/jomr.2015.6101",

language = "English",

volume = "6",

pages = "e1",

journal = "Journal of Oral and Maxillofacial Research",

issn = "2029-283X",

number = "1",

}

What is the Risk of Having Offspring with Cleft Lip/Palate in Pre-Maternal Obese/Overweight Women When Compared to Pre-Maternal Normal Weight Women? A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. / Izedonmwen, Omoroghogho Maria; Cunningham, Claudia; Macfarlane, Tatiana V.
In: Journal of Oral and Maxillofacial Research, Vol. 6, No. 1, 06.05.2015, p. e1.

Research output: Contribution to journal › Article › peer-review

TY - JOUR

T1 - What is the Risk of Having Offspring with Cleft Lip/Palate in Pre-Maternal Obese/Overweight Women When Compared to Pre-Maternal Normal Weight Women?

T2 - A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

AU - Izedonmwen, Omoroghogho Maria

AU - Cunningham, Claudia

AU - Macfarlane, Tatiana V

PY - 2015/5/6

Y1 - 2015/5/6

N2 - OBJECTIVES: The purpose of the study was to identify the risk of orofacial cleft in the offspring of women with pre-maternal obesity/overweight when compared with pre-maternal normal weight women.MATERIAL AND METHODS: MEDLINE and EMBASE were searched from 1980 to July 2014 for cohort, case control and cross sectional studies. BMI were categorized according to WHO recommendation: normal weight (BMI 18.5 - 24.9), overweight (BMI 25 - 29.9) and obese (BMI ≥ 30).RESULTS: Six studies were identified; three case control studies which were used for the meta-analysis and two cross sectional studies and one cohort study. Compared with women of recommended BMI, obese women were at increased odds of pregnancy affected by CLP (OR = 1.16; 95% CI 1, 1.34) and CP (OR = 1.14; 95% CI 0.95, 1.37). Overweight women were also at increased odds of pregnancy affected by CLP (OR = 1.06; 95% CI 0.93, 1.21) but not CP (OR = 0.89; 95% CI 0.75, 1.06). The results of the risk ratios reported in the cross sectional and cohort studies were similar to the results of the meta-analysis.CONCLUSIONS: The results of this study reveal that there is an increased risk of having offspring with orofacial cleft in obese/overweight women. The reason for this association is not known. Although, the risk is small, it is important because of the increasing incidence of obesity.

AB - OBJECTIVES: The purpose of the study was to identify the risk of orofacial cleft in the offspring of women with pre-maternal obesity/overweight when compared with pre-maternal normal weight women.MATERIAL AND METHODS: MEDLINE and EMBASE were searched from 1980 to July 2014 for cohort, case control and cross sectional studies. BMI were categorized according to WHO recommendation: normal weight (BMI 18.5 - 24.9), overweight (BMI 25 - 29.9) and obese (BMI ≥ 30).RESULTS: Six studies were identified; three case control studies which were used for the meta-analysis and two cross sectional studies and one cohort study. Compared with women of recommended BMI, obese women were at increased odds of pregnancy affected by CLP (OR = 1.16; 95% CI 1, 1.34) and CP (OR = 1.14; 95% CI 0.95, 1.37). Overweight women were also at increased odds of pregnancy affected by CLP (OR = 1.06; 95% CI 0.93, 1.21) but not CP (OR = 0.89; 95% CI 0.75, 1.06). The results of the risk ratios reported in the cross sectional and cohort studies were similar to the results of the meta-analysis.CONCLUSIONS: The results of this study reveal that there is an increased risk of having offspring with orofacial cleft in obese/overweight women. The reason for this association is not known. Although, the risk is small, it is important because of the increasing incidence of obesity.

KW - Journal Article

KW - Review

U2 - 10.5037/jomr.2015.6101

DO - 10.5037/jomr.2015.6101

M3 - Article

C2 - 25937872

SN - 2029-283X

VL - 6

SP - e1

JO - Journal of Oral and Maxillofacial Research

JF - Journal of Oral and Maxillofacial Research

IS - 1

ER -