What Matters in Practice? Understanding 'Quality' in the Routine Supervision of Offenders in Scotland

Scott Grant (Lead / Corresponding author), Fergus McNeill

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

    9 Citations (Scopus)
    46 Downloads (Pure)

    Abstract

    Little is known about the nature, character and construction of quality in the routine supervision of offenders in Scotland. Quality is an important yet contested concept with multiple facets and features, but its meanings for practitioners are under-researched. This article will present findings from a study using Appreciative Inquiry to reveal how Scottish criminal justice social workers attempt to conceptualise and construct meanings of quality in their daily practice with people who have offended. Our findings conclude that, despite significant fluctuation in criminal justice policy and practice, practitioners' ideas of quality seem to suggest resilience to both managerialism and punitiveness. Practitioners ultimately located quality within relational processes underpinned by social work values, but also saw it as being underscored by (or undermined by the lack of) adequate resourcing, professional supervision, flexibility and training.

    Original languageEnglish
    Pages (from-to)1985-2002
    Number of pages18
    JournalBritish Journal of Social Work
    Volume45
    Issue number7
    Early online date26 Mar 2014
    DOIs
    Publication statusPublished - Oct 2015

    Keywords

    • Community corrections
    • criminal justice social work
    • effectiveness
    • offender supervision
    • probation
    • quality

    Fingerprint

    Dive into the research topics of 'What Matters in Practice? Understanding 'Quality' in the Routine Supervision of Offenders in Scotland'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

    Cite this