What was the Religious Crisis of the 1960s?

Callum G. Brown

    Research output: Contribution to journalReview article

    21 Citations (Scopus)

    Abstract

    The crisis of the 1960s is now central to debates about religious change and secularisation in the twentieth century. However, the nature of the crisis is contested. Using Hugh McLeod's The Religious Crisis of the 1960s (2007) as a starting point, this article explores the issues that divide scholars - the origin and length of the crisis (was it revolution or evolution?); was it generated more by developments within the Christian churches or by developments without them; and what was the relative importance of liberal Christianity versus conservative Christianity in the development and legacy of the crisis? It argues that secularisation of the period should be regarded as mostly a sudden and shocking event, based on external threats, and reflected in the churches dividing between liberals and conservatives in ways that were to become ever more militant as the century wore on.

    Original languageEnglish
    Pages (from-to)468-479
    Number of pages12
    JournalJournal of Religious History
    Volume34
    Issue number4
    DOIs
    Publication statusPublished - Dec 2010

    Cite this

    Brown, Callum G. / What was the Religious Crisis of the 1960s?. In: Journal of Religious History. 2010 ; Vol. 34, No. 4. pp. 468-479.
    @article{ae8aa9b9019741f68b3d8b455a07c6b6,
    title = "What was the Religious Crisis of the 1960s?",
    abstract = "The crisis of the 1960s is now central to debates about religious change and secularisation in the twentieth century. However, the nature of the crisis is contested. Using Hugh McLeod's The Religious Crisis of the 1960s (2007) as a starting point, this article explores the issues that divide scholars - the origin and length of the crisis (was it revolution or evolution?); was it generated more by developments within the Christian churches or by developments without them; and what was the relative importance of liberal Christianity versus conservative Christianity in the development and legacy of the crisis? It argues that secularisation of the period should be regarded as mostly a sudden and shocking event, based on external threats, and reflected in the churches dividing between liberals and conservatives in ways that were to become ever more militant as the century wore on.",
    author = "Brown, {Callum G.}",
    year = "2010",
    month = "12",
    doi = "10.1111/j.1467-9809.2010.00909.x",
    language = "English",
    volume = "34",
    pages = "468--479",
    journal = "Journal of Religious History",
    issn = "0022-4227",
    publisher = "Wiley",
    number = "4",

    }

    What was the Religious Crisis of the 1960s? / Brown, Callum G.

    In: Journal of Religious History, Vol. 34, No. 4, 12.2010, p. 468-479.

    Research output: Contribution to journalReview article

    TY - JOUR

    T1 - What was the Religious Crisis of the 1960s?

    AU - Brown, Callum G.

    PY - 2010/12

    Y1 - 2010/12

    N2 - The crisis of the 1960s is now central to debates about religious change and secularisation in the twentieth century. However, the nature of the crisis is contested. Using Hugh McLeod's The Religious Crisis of the 1960s (2007) as a starting point, this article explores the issues that divide scholars - the origin and length of the crisis (was it revolution or evolution?); was it generated more by developments within the Christian churches or by developments without them; and what was the relative importance of liberal Christianity versus conservative Christianity in the development and legacy of the crisis? It argues that secularisation of the period should be regarded as mostly a sudden and shocking event, based on external threats, and reflected in the churches dividing between liberals and conservatives in ways that were to become ever more militant as the century wore on.

    AB - The crisis of the 1960s is now central to debates about religious change and secularisation in the twentieth century. However, the nature of the crisis is contested. Using Hugh McLeod's The Religious Crisis of the 1960s (2007) as a starting point, this article explores the issues that divide scholars - the origin and length of the crisis (was it revolution or evolution?); was it generated more by developments within the Christian churches or by developments without them; and what was the relative importance of liberal Christianity versus conservative Christianity in the development and legacy of the crisis? It argues that secularisation of the period should be regarded as mostly a sudden and shocking event, based on external threats, and reflected in the churches dividing between liberals and conservatives in ways that were to become ever more militant as the century wore on.

    U2 - 10.1111/j.1467-9809.2010.00909.x

    DO - 10.1111/j.1467-9809.2010.00909.x

    M3 - Review article

    VL - 34

    SP - 468

    EP - 479

    JO - Journal of Religious History

    JF - Journal of Religious History

    SN - 0022-4227

    IS - 4

    ER -