Abstract
Snowball sampling is frequently advocated and employed by qualitative social researchers. Under certain circumstances, however, it is prone to faltering and even failure. Drawing on two research projects where the snowball failed to roll, the paper identifies reasons for this stasis. It goes on to argue that there are alternative forms of networking that can be developed by the qualitative social researcher in lieu of snowballing. Specifically, when research momentum fails to build, rather than drilling down vertically through social networks, we argue that the researcher can move horizontally across social networks and cast the sampling and recruitment net wide and shallow rather than deep. This change in emphasis can, we argue, make the difference between a project failing and a project succeeding, and points to the importance of a variegated understanding of the social networks on which our social research depends.
Original language | English |
---|---|
Pages (from-to) | 347-358 |
Number of pages | 13 |
Journal | International Journal of Social Research Methodology |
Volume | 21 |
Issue number | 3 |
Early online date | 24 Nov 2017 |
DOIs | |
Publication status | Published - 2018 |
Keywords
- interview
- network
- qualitative
- recruitment
- sampling
- snowball
- ties
Fingerprint
Dive into the research topics of 'When the snowball fails to roll and the use of ‘horizontal’ networking in qualitative social research'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.Profiles
-
Geddes, Alistair
- Energy Environment and Society - Senior Lecturer (Teaching and Research)
Person: Academic