Abstract
This article empirically investigates why in a corruption-pervasive country only a minority of the firms get caught for bribery while the majority get away with it. By matching manufacturing firms to a blacklist of bribers in the healthcare sector of a province in China, we show that the government-led blacklisting is selective: while economically more visible firms are slightly more likely to be blacklisted, state-controlled firms are the most protected compared to their private and foreign competitors. Our finding points to the fact that a government can use regulations to impose its preferences when the rule of law is weak and the rule of government is strong.
| Original language | English |
|---|---|
| Pages (from-to) | 258-263 |
| Number of pages | 6 |
| Journal | Applied Economics Letters |
| Volume | 24 |
| Issue number | 4 |
| Early online date | 14 May 2016 |
| DOIs | |
| Publication status | Published - 2017 |
UN SDGs
This output contributes to the following UN Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs)
-
SDG 16 Peace, Justice and Strong Institutions
Keywords
- Corruption
- bibery
- healthcare
- China
Fingerprint
Dive into the research topics of 'Who gets caught for corruption when corruption is pervasive? Evidence from China’s anti-bribery blacklist'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.Cite this
- APA
- Author
- BIBTEX
- Harvard
- Standard
- RIS
- Vancouver