Why legislate for sustainable development? an examination of sustainable development provisions in UK and Scottish statutes

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

    19 Citations (Scopus)

    Abstract

    This article examines the use of the term ‘sustainable development’ in Acts of the Scottish and UK Parliaments. It begins by examining the UK's traditional reluctance to legislate on sustainable development, the more recent reversal of that approach and some definitional issues surrounding the term. It then moves on to consider the sustainable development provisions in detail examining their form, strength and limits, and how they can be monitored, reviewed and enforced both inside and outside court. The article concludes that over and above any symbolic value, in many instances the provisions also have legal significance. The formulations vary and while some are simply material considerations to be used in decision-making, those which set out mandatory requirements such as reports do create binding legal rules. Furthermore, there are a few examples where the duty or objective is set out as a clear legal rule that could be interpreted as providing a framework for decision-making.
    Original languageEnglish
    Pages (from-to)35-68
    Number of pages34
    JournalJournal of Environmental Law
    Volume20
    Issue number1
    DOIs
    Publication statusPublished - 2008

    Fingerprint

    statute
    sustainable development
    examination
    decision making
    parliament
    act
    court
    material

    Keywords

    • Sustainable development
    • Statutes
    • Duties
    • Scotland

    Cite this

    @article{a561a29e6ce84194a5853f50a702da42,
    title = "Why legislate for sustainable development?: an examination of sustainable development provisions in UK and Scottish statutes",
    abstract = "This article examines the use of the term ‘sustainable development’ in Acts of the Scottish and UK Parliaments. It begins by examining the UK's traditional reluctance to legislate on sustainable development, the more recent reversal of that approach and some definitional issues surrounding the term. It then moves on to consider the sustainable development provisions in detail examining their form, strength and limits, and how they can be monitored, reviewed and enforced both inside and outside court. The article concludes that over and above any symbolic value, in many instances the provisions also have legal significance. The formulations vary and while some are simply material considerations to be used in decision-making, those which set out mandatory requirements such as reports do create binding legal rules. Furthermore, there are a few examples where the duty or objective is set out as a clear legal rule that could be interpreted as providing a framework for decision-making.",
    keywords = "Sustainable development, Statutes, Duties, Scotland",
    author = "Andrea Ross",
    year = "2008",
    doi = "10.1093/jel/eqm019",
    language = "English",
    volume = "20",
    pages = "35--68",
    journal = "Journal of Environmental Law",
    issn = "0952-8873",
    publisher = "Oxford University Press",
    number = "1",

    }

    TY - JOUR

    T1 - Why legislate for sustainable development?

    T2 - an examination of sustainable development provisions in UK and Scottish statutes

    AU - Ross, Andrea

    PY - 2008

    Y1 - 2008

    N2 - This article examines the use of the term ‘sustainable development’ in Acts of the Scottish and UK Parliaments. It begins by examining the UK's traditional reluctance to legislate on sustainable development, the more recent reversal of that approach and some definitional issues surrounding the term. It then moves on to consider the sustainable development provisions in detail examining their form, strength and limits, and how they can be monitored, reviewed and enforced both inside and outside court. The article concludes that over and above any symbolic value, in many instances the provisions also have legal significance. The formulations vary and while some are simply material considerations to be used in decision-making, those which set out mandatory requirements such as reports do create binding legal rules. Furthermore, there are a few examples where the duty or objective is set out as a clear legal rule that could be interpreted as providing a framework for decision-making.

    AB - This article examines the use of the term ‘sustainable development’ in Acts of the Scottish and UK Parliaments. It begins by examining the UK's traditional reluctance to legislate on sustainable development, the more recent reversal of that approach and some definitional issues surrounding the term. It then moves on to consider the sustainable development provisions in detail examining their form, strength and limits, and how they can be monitored, reviewed and enforced both inside and outside court. The article concludes that over and above any symbolic value, in many instances the provisions also have legal significance. The formulations vary and while some are simply material considerations to be used in decision-making, those which set out mandatory requirements such as reports do create binding legal rules. Furthermore, there are a few examples where the duty or objective is set out as a clear legal rule that could be interpreted as providing a framework for decision-making.

    KW - Sustainable development

    KW - Statutes

    KW - Duties

    KW - Scotland

    U2 - 10.1093/jel/eqm019

    DO - 10.1093/jel/eqm019

    M3 - Article

    VL - 20

    SP - 35

    EP - 68

    JO - Journal of Environmental Law

    JF - Journal of Environmental Law

    SN - 0952-8873

    IS - 1

    ER -