Will you get vaccinated? Trade‐offs between purity, liberty and care predict attitudes towards Covid‐19 vaccination

Amrita Ahluwalia-McMeddes (Lead / Corresponding author), Sarah L. Guthrie, Catriona Z. Taylor

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

1 Citation (Scopus)
18 Downloads (Pure)

Abstract

How do tensions between moral values predict how likely we are to receive Covid-19 vaccination? Previous work suggests that moral foundations, particularly purity and liberty, relate to decisions to vaccinate. In addition, research on the moral trade-off hypothesis suggests value in exploring trade-offs between foundations. We conducted three studies across the pandemic: at the start of the vaccine rollout (Study 1, N = 170); during delivery (Study 2, N = 328) and 2 years later (Study 3, N = 388). We find that trade-offs between purity and care and between liberty and care are predictive of higher levels of vaccine reluctance—individuals who endorse purity or liberty more, relative to care, were more reluctant towards Covid-19 vaccination, less likely to have received a vaccine and have lower intention to get future Covid-19 vaccines. This research highlights the relevance of moral values, and trade-offs between them, in vaccine attitudes and decisions.

Original languageEnglish
Number of pages14
JournalEuropean Journal of Social Psychology
Early online date5 Mar 2024
DOIs
Publication statusE-pub ahead of print - 5 Mar 2024

Keywords

  • Covid-19
  • moral foundations theory
  • moral judgement
  • moral trade-offs
  • vaccination

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Social Psychology

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Will you get vaccinated? Trade‐offs between purity, liberty and care predict attitudes towards Covid‐19 vaccination'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this