Workplace-based assessment for general practitioners

using stakeholder perception to aid blueprinting of an assessment battery

Douglas J. Murphy, David Bruce, Kevin W. Eva

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

    15 Citations (Scopus)

    Abstract

    CONTEXT The implementation of an assessment system may be facilitated by stakeholder agreement that appropriate qualities are being tested. This study investigated the extent to which stakeholders perceived 8 assessment formats (multiple-choice questions, objective structured clinical examination, video, significant event analysis, criterion audit, multi-source feedback, case analysis and patient satisfaction questionnaire) as able to assess varying qualities of doctors training in UK general practice.

    METHODS Educationalists, general practice trainers and registrars completed a blueprinting style of exercise to rate the extent to which each evaluation format was perceived to assess each of 8 competencies derived primarily from the General Medical Council document Good Medical Practice.

    RESULTS There were high levels of agreement among stakeholders regarding the perceived qualities tested by the proposed formats (G = 0.82-0.93). Differences were found in participants' perceptions of how well qualities were able to be assessed and in the ability of the respective formats to test each quality. Multi-source feedback (MSF) was expected to assess a wide range of qualities, whereas Probity, Health and Ability to work with colleagues were limited in terms of how well they could be tested by the proposed formats.

    DISCUSSION Awareness of the perceptions of stakeholders should facilitate the development and implementation of workplace-based assessment (WPBA) systems. These data shed light on the acceptability of various formats in a way that will inform further investigation of WPBA formats' validity and feasibility, while also providing evidence on which to base educational efforts regarding the value of each format.

    Original languageEnglish
    Pages (from-to)96-103
    Number of pages8
    JournalMedical Education
    Volume42
    Issue number1
    DOIs
    Publication statusPublished - Jan 2008

    Keywords

    • family practice, education
    • educational measurement, methods
    • education, medical, graduate, methods
    • Great Britain
    • workplace
    • EMPATHY CARE MEASURE
    • CONSULTATION
    • RELIABILITY
    • PERFORMANCE
    • COMPETENCE
    • EDUCATION

    Cite this

    @article{e80cd5ac66b242d1bea0b587ca0b93f8,
    title = "Workplace-based assessment for general practitioners: using stakeholder perception to aid blueprinting of an assessment battery",
    abstract = "CONTEXT The implementation of an assessment system may be facilitated by stakeholder agreement that appropriate qualities are being tested. This study investigated the extent to which stakeholders perceived 8 assessment formats (multiple-choice questions, objective structured clinical examination, video, significant event analysis, criterion audit, multi-source feedback, case analysis and patient satisfaction questionnaire) as able to assess varying qualities of doctors training in UK general practice.METHODS Educationalists, general practice trainers and registrars completed a blueprinting style of exercise to rate the extent to which each evaluation format was perceived to assess each of 8 competencies derived primarily from the General Medical Council document Good Medical Practice.RESULTS There were high levels of agreement among stakeholders regarding the perceived qualities tested by the proposed formats (G = 0.82-0.93). Differences were found in participants' perceptions of how well qualities were able to be assessed and in the ability of the respective formats to test each quality. Multi-source feedback (MSF) was expected to assess a wide range of qualities, whereas Probity, Health and Ability to work with colleagues were limited in terms of how well they could be tested by the proposed formats.DISCUSSION Awareness of the perceptions of stakeholders should facilitate the development and implementation of workplace-based assessment (WPBA) systems. These data shed light on the acceptability of various formats in a way that will inform further investigation of WPBA formats' validity and feasibility, while also providing evidence on which to base educational efforts regarding the value of each format.",
    keywords = "family practice, education, educational measurement, methods, education, medical, graduate, methods, Great Britain, workplace, EMPATHY CARE MEASURE, CONSULTATION, RELIABILITY, PERFORMANCE, COMPETENCE, EDUCATION",
    author = "Murphy, {Douglas J.} and David Bruce and Eva, {Kevin W.}",
    year = "2008",
    month = "1",
    doi = "10.1111/j.1365-2923.2007.02952.x",
    language = "English",
    volume = "42",
    pages = "96--103",
    journal = "Medical Education",
    issn = "0308-0110",
    publisher = "Wiley",
    number = "1",

    }

    Workplace-based assessment for general practitioners : using stakeholder perception to aid blueprinting of an assessment battery. / Murphy, Douglas J.; Bruce, David; Eva, Kevin W.

    In: Medical Education, Vol. 42, No. 1, 01.2008, p. 96-103.

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

    TY - JOUR

    T1 - Workplace-based assessment for general practitioners

    T2 - using stakeholder perception to aid blueprinting of an assessment battery

    AU - Murphy, Douglas J.

    AU - Bruce, David

    AU - Eva, Kevin W.

    PY - 2008/1

    Y1 - 2008/1

    N2 - CONTEXT The implementation of an assessment system may be facilitated by stakeholder agreement that appropriate qualities are being tested. This study investigated the extent to which stakeholders perceived 8 assessment formats (multiple-choice questions, objective structured clinical examination, video, significant event analysis, criterion audit, multi-source feedback, case analysis and patient satisfaction questionnaire) as able to assess varying qualities of doctors training in UK general practice.METHODS Educationalists, general practice trainers and registrars completed a blueprinting style of exercise to rate the extent to which each evaluation format was perceived to assess each of 8 competencies derived primarily from the General Medical Council document Good Medical Practice.RESULTS There were high levels of agreement among stakeholders regarding the perceived qualities tested by the proposed formats (G = 0.82-0.93). Differences were found in participants' perceptions of how well qualities were able to be assessed and in the ability of the respective formats to test each quality. Multi-source feedback (MSF) was expected to assess a wide range of qualities, whereas Probity, Health and Ability to work with colleagues were limited in terms of how well they could be tested by the proposed formats.DISCUSSION Awareness of the perceptions of stakeholders should facilitate the development and implementation of workplace-based assessment (WPBA) systems. These data shed light on the acceptability of various formats in a way that will inform further investigation of WPBA formats' validity and feasibility, while also providing evidence on which to base educational efforts regarding the value of each format.

    AB - CONTEXT The implementation of an assessment system may be facilitated by stakeholder agreement that appropriate qualities are being tested. This study investigated the extent to which stakeholders perceived 8 assessment formats (multiple-choice questions, objective structured clinical examination, video, significant event analysis, criterion audit, multi-source feedback, case analysis and patient satisfaction questionnaire) as able to assess varying qualities of doctors training in UK general practice.METHODS Educationalists, general practice trainers and registrars completed a blueprinting style of exercise to rate the extent to which each evaluation format was perceived to assess each of 8 competencies derived primarily from the General Medical Council document Good Medical Practice.RESULTS There were high levels of agreement among stakeholders regarding the perceived qualities tested by the proposed formats (G = 0.82-0.93). Differences were found in participants' perceptions of how well qualities were able to be assessed and in the ability of the respective formats to test each quality. Multi-source feedback (MSF) was expected to assess a wide range of qualities, whereas Probity, Health and Ability to work with colleagues were limited in terms of how well they could be tested by the proposed formats.DISCUSSION Awareness of the perceptions of stakeholders should facilitate the development and implementation of workplace-based assessment (WPBA) systems. These data shed light on the acceptability of various formats in a way that will inform further investigation of WPBA formats' validity and feasibility, while also providing evidence on which to base educational efforts regarding the value of each format.

    KW - family practice, education

    KW - educational measurement, methods

    KW - education, medical, graduate, methods

    KW - Great Britain

    KW - workplace

    KW - EMPATHY CARE MEASURE

    KW - CONSULTATION

    KW - RELIABILITY

    KW - PERFORMANCE

    KW - COMPETENCE

    KW - EDUCATION

    U2 - 10.1111/j.1365-2923.2007.02952.x

    DO - 10.1111/j.1365-2923.2007.02952.x

    M3 - Article

    VL - 42

    SP - 96

    EP - 103

    JO - Medical Education

    JF - Medical Education

    SN - 0308-0110

    IS - 1

    ER -